The Supremacist. 3. Genius

Episode3 of the new series “The Supremacist” features three White geniuses. What do they do? What should our genius inventors do?
Do you know of any other White geniuses? If so, please inform. Who, and what are they fantastic at, and where can I see info about them and their work? Best of all, could I interview any of them?
We must incite the best out of our best to win this war against jewry and their two-legged tools.




Eric Dollard on the Sun – the link is still availabe on JewTube so not sure how accurate this info is but the whole interview is pretty interesting. As someone who has been digging in many different rabbit holes and trapped but this or that guru (guru=jew controlled agent, aka controlled opposition, the main face of some limited hangout, a shill, you get the idea) I accepted this information and stored it somewhere in my brain but my position is neutral as I have no way of proving or disproving it. One claim he makes that you cannot see the sun in the space, you can only see it from Earth surface. Hmmm… has he been to space to prove it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PM5zrzd4pOU
I’m impressed that you’re into this, Eliza.
I don’t remember what I said, exactly, about Eric Dollard in this show. I initiated with him a series of back-and-forth snail-mails several years ago. I irked him a little, and he irked me, and I irked him back. I still have all the letters, though I’ve never re-read them.
About the Sun, he said nobody could explain what it really is nor the source of its energy.
I told him about the (very irritating mixed-bag) independent scientist James McCanney and his theory of the Sun as burning hydrogen, that its core is cool and it’s surface and atmosphere is where the burning takes place, that it gets its hydrogen from the surrounding space, and that the Sun and outer “ring” (so to speak) of the Solar System form a capacitor. Comets light up like lightbulbs because at that time they are discharging the solar capacitor, with electricity from the Sun flowing through them and out to the outer “ring.”
Eric Dollard said he was intrigued by McCanney’s work. I wanted to put Dollard and McCanney into contact with each other. But at that time, Dollard proclaimed he did nothing on computers, which would have been the way to make contact. And McCanney had stopped replying to my occasional email because I criticized him for some of his absurdities. So, as far as I know, Dollard and McCanney never communicated with each other. (Personally, I like McCanney’s hard-sciences work — space science, electricity, magnetic fields, comets, etc.)
As for Dollard’s idea of not being able to see the Sun in space, he said that the “light” from the Sun doesn’t become visible to us until it comes into contact with material, such as our atmosphere. I countered that idea:
I told him that NOBODY had ever looked at the Sun in space WITHOUT the Sun’s output hitting material first.
1. Atoms and molecules of basic elements are scattered in space — space is NOT empty, obviously, and not a complete “vacuum,” obviously, despite what jews constantly force-fed us.
2. Thus, the Sun’s output is hitting that material every mile of the way from there to here, making it visible according to his requirement.
3. Astronauts always said they saw the Sun (while in low Earth orbit; they’ve never been higher). Every astronaut was wearing a helmet filled with oxygen (material to be hit by the Sun’s output) and with a visor to be hit by the Sun’s output. So, NOBODY had EVER looked at the Sun without material between his eyes and the Sun, nor could anyone do so.
4. Eric Dollard buys the Apollo missions and insults us who say nobody has flown to the Moon and returned alive, and nobody alive has ever landed on the Moon.
So, he turned a bit hostile at me.
You asked, rhetorically, “has he been to space to prove” his claim? As you know, he has not. He would be irked at you, too!
Naturally, as a man used to being worshipped for his true genius on electricity and electronics, he is not used to someone using a few facts and simple logic to destroy a position he has taken, even when that position is NOT in his main area of expertise.
By the way, I originally wrote to him to offer some info on jews, which he obviously did not know as shown in his statements about certain things. The short story on what happened with that is it went well for a few letters and took a turn, with him irking me. Maybe if he dies soon, though I hope he does not, I’ll do a show of reading and commenting on all the letters. It would be very interesting to some of my audience, but not many, I imagine.
I would certainly be interested and I totally see your point. I have grown to accept only irrefutable facts (as far as we know, because I think you and I know, the victor writes the history and subverts anything not congruent to it) so the “facts” might not be the “facts” as you and I understand them. And, also, I want to say that even though I THINK I have grown enough to detect some foul play I am not immune to it. I have been on this “journey” , for about 5 years, so let’s see how “immune” I have become. All I can say at this point is that it wasn’t easy and it’s getting harder….
I also want to add that I’m at a fence regarding this whole idea of ether and what it really is. The first question I asked myself, coming from jeducational system, where I was taught the the sun was millions of miles away (93 million miles according to the jewtannica here https://www.britannica.com/topic/How-Far-Is-the-Sun-from-Earth), and this burning ball of flames sends out rays to warm up the neighboring planets to the point that on some of them the life can be developed and sustained…. Ok…. Let’s say I buy it.
OK, so when I light a campfire in the forest to keep myself warm (and I’ve done that a couple of times :)), the further I move from the fire, the colder it gets. So the electric charge, perceived by my human body as “warmth” can travel only so far. There is a point that that particular form of energy gets diffused to the point of non existence, it simply dissipates or is absorbed by the surrounding temperature. But the marvelous sun rays, can penetrate about 53 miles of the mesosphere of freezing layer to miraculously get hot again, very close to the Earth surface and warm things up again….. Interesting, wouldn’t you say? Maybe someone has some coherent answer to it, because I think there is more going on here and I was not able to find it. There’s no denying things get hot in the sun shining directly at them, but how, if that mesosphere exists??
And I watched people climbing Mt. Everest for example and getting frostbites, and being deprived of oxygen….unless all those documentaries were doctored, then that mesosphere exists… BUT….
Hi, Eliza. Good thinking. Interesting points and questions. I can go part way, in one comment of reasonable length, to help.
The aether. It was commonly accepted by White scientists at least up to about the year 1900. As Nikola Tesla said, there must be a medium through which things travel (things such as the visible light “rays,” the nonvisible “rays,” electricity, and gravity). If there’s no medium there whatsoever, there’s nothing to facilitate the travel of things, nor the propagation of things claimed to travel in waves. Then along came jews Einstein et al, claiming there was no aether, no electricity in space, etc., and derailed space science from then on. I hold to the aether theory. But exactly what it is nobody knows nor pretends to know, as far as I know. Eric Dollard correctly rejects the jew Einsteinian garbage, and he says the aether can’t be physical. As I vaguely recall, Tesla thought it to be minimally physical. (Examples of “not physical”: electricity, magnetism.)
Heat. There are different kinds of heat, and different ways it can “travel.” It can propagate from molecule to molecule. Or, it can be carried, or eventually cause heat where it strikes, such as infrared light. And certain rays from the Sun can cause electrical “joule heating” when they strike, such as when hitting ocean water and warming the surface water. “Heat” is a helluva subject that I don’t fully understand, as it is complicated, and I have yet to read someone showing a full understanding of it. (By the way, so is water!)
The heating ability of the Sun’s output (which can cause heating in multiple ways including those mentioned above) does lessen as distance increases. Thus, no planet farther from the Sun than, say, Mars, can be warm enough to support our kind of life. But Mars cannot do so now because it has nearly no atmosphere, which is needed to hold water on a planet’s surface and to contain and spread heat. And closer to the Sun than Earth, it’s too hot. Venus has a very thick atmosphere of poison and a molten surface. Mercury has no atmosphere and is a crusty hot ball. NOTE: I say these things matter-of-factly, as IF I know. But I’m accepting as true a combination of White-science findings from the past and much of what that mixed-bag scientist James McCanney reports as if he knows it’s true.
Up on Mt. Everest, there’s much less atmosphere to hold and circulate any heat. They’re getting more of particular kinds of radiation (harmful) from the Sun, but there’s not enough of the heating kind of radiation to counter the cold of that altitude with the extremely thin atmosphere.
Another very interesting thing to remember about our atmosphere, here near the Earth’s surface, so we’re told, is that it is about 80 percent nitrogen gas, about 19 percent oxygen gas, and the other gases including carbon-dioxide all fit in that last ONE percent. There’s litle to no talk about all that nitrogen gas and what our bodies may do with it, or what would happen to us without it.
If we could get jews out of the way, there’s a lot for us to re-learn, throw away, and investigate to move forward. We have a huge White Knowledge System (now horribly corrupted by jewry), yet there is more to learn in the future than we have learned in this go-round since the last Earthly cataclysm mass-extinction event.
PS. On sizes and distances of the Earth, Moon, and Sun, I very much like the following video (which I saved years ago) showing how these can be calculated using basic geometry — and were long ago. Let me know if you find it fatally flawed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urgYWNCN-RA
This is a good video explanation. And it looks correct to me.
I think the flat-Earth drivers are jews, duping many people into believing the flat Earch nonsense.
Thank you very much for checking it, Doug. And of course we agree on the jews being the ongoing pushers of F.E.
I just want to say that I did watch the video but I have to watch it probably three more times before voicing my opinion. Math and physics were never my strongest suits. I admit the Flat Earth was the first spiderweb I was trapped in since starting this “journey” and the gurus there present, in a very similar fashion, that the sun is the same size as the moon and it’s only 4,000 miles from the Earth. Also using the same geometry we all have been taught, and the equilateral triangle based on how the visible sun rays hit the Earth.
One thing that immediately raised the red flag is the set value of cos at 390. It’s probably my ignorance of math but I want to understand how this value is true and proven so need some more time to dig here. Right now I’m enjoying THE SUPREMACIST 🙂