Let Carolyn Yeager LIE
Yes, I speak of the owner and writer of the website CarolynYeager.net .
Since she wouldn’t allow me to defend myself in my one and only reply to her hostility and rudeness against me and my first comment, I defend myself here. Note: She cut my reply in half and then proceeded to claim I offered no evidence to support my statements.
We expect better treatment from a fellow White person and truthteller.
Yes, she lied against me. And I say, for multiple reasons, just let her lie in the sense of shunning her, let her be, alone, and sliding toward mental and physical demise.
So, you might watch this for the above information, or you might like the included info on Rudolf Hess, his flight to Scotland, and on David Irving.
Author: jbl
Born to White parents who were born in the U.S.A., of proud German and proud Irish ancestry. Consider how great our lives would be if we had been born and raised in a country controlled by our own people -- as it should be -- rather than controlled by jews pretending to be our own people.
David Irving was controlled opposition and not a real holocaust truthteller.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/6kWkcdYUecpb/
Thanks, Bubba. Agreed.
Elsewhere on this site and my previous site, I focused on David Irving, his books, and his negatives, which were too big to excuse.
A week or so ago, I made a rare visit to his website to see if maybe his death — or recovery — was announced. What I found was a totally CLEANSED site. I guess we’ll never get the second volume of his bio on Himmler, which I was looking forward to. Of course, I wouldn’t have paid for it. I would have waited till someone posted a free pdf of it.
The Jews even made a film called Denial about David Irving and his trial with Deborah Lipstadt which is more proof he was controlled.
Excellent post Bubba thanks for sharing. Case close on Irving
There is also this whale article
http://whale.to/b//irving_h.html
Gentlemen,
I have read some of Irving’s work and before the jews got angry with him, he had success with his sales, most noteworthy his first book on Dresden (which I haven’t read… yet). He did the job he was good at and that is researching history. Sadly, in attempt to stay relevant and on the bookstore shelves while being seriously cancelled, he cucked on the holohoax saying ‘it happened’, ‘limited gassings’, ‘uncertain numbers here and there but overall figure correct.’ Pathetic, I agree. And what a disappointment because he was meticulous, avoiding the generalities and dog-piling of the “court historians.”
Listen to some of his earlier talks if you haven’t already. I know the later stuff when he’s in freefall is downright painful.
Remember, he launched the suit against Lipstadt. He was cashed up and in a fit of hubris. Whether he had taken a barrister or acted on his own, as he chose to do, I think he would have lost regardless in kangaroo-courts Britain. He was overconfident,
knowing Lipstadt to be actually a dumbass, he figured he’d walk all over her. Read her book, Denying the Holocaust, (I have done) and you’ll know it. I’m sure Irving had read it and knew she had nothing to counter him. He didn’t reckon on the system being biased if not outright against him.